BRITANNIA ON COINS
By Guy de la Bédoyère
Back to the Home Page

In
The idea of representing a place or concept with a human figure
goes right back to the coins issued by the Romans, who themselves had taken the
idea from the Greeks. On Roman coins, each female figure was equipped with very
specific attributes. Sometimes Britannia is confused with Roma, though in fact
the two were quite different. Roma wore a helmet and held a Victory, while
Britannia is bare-headed, holds a military standard and spear and is seated on
rocks with a distinctive shield bearing a sharp central point.
Britannia was a province of the
Britannia first
appeared on coins struck by Hadrian (117-38) in about the year 119. The coin
was a copper as (diameter 25mm). You can see the figure of Britannia
here, hunched up on a rock with her shield and spear. The word BRITANNIA
appears under the figure and around it some imperial titles. The SC stands for Senatus Consulto
meaning ‘[struck] by order of the Senate’. The coin probably commemorates
warfare on the northern frontier that led to the construction of Hadrian’s Wall.
More Britannia
coins were issued later in Hadrian’s reign as part of a general series of sestertii that depicted the provinces of the
Empire (see next coin for what a sestertius
was). Hadrian had spent much of his reign touring the Roman world, and some of
these showed the personifications of provinces greeting him. This coin (left)
is the incredibly rare ADVENTVI.AVG.BRITANNIAE (‘the coming of the emperor to
The next
Britannia issues appeared in 143, struck by Antoninus
Pius (138-161). The coins undoubtedly refer to warfare, which is testified in
historical sources and had led to the erection of a new frontier further north.
This is a brass sestertius (diameter 31 mm and
equal to 4 asses). The word BRITANNIA is under the figure on this coin
but there were several different types – some have BRITANNIA around the
figure.
Antoninus Pius also struck another series of Britannia coins in 154.
This time the copper as was used. The coins were poorly struck and
almost always only turn up in
Apart from some
coins of Commodus struck in 184, that was almost the last time Britannia appeared on Roman coins.
The rebel emperor Carausius (286-93) conducted a vigorous propaganda
campaign to legitimise his rule. On one special issue he showed Britannia
greeting him as a kind of messianic saviour.
It would be more than 13
centuries before Britannia was revived on coins, copied from the old Roman
coins. The new Britannia came under Charles II (1660-85). In 1665 a series of
farthing-sized medals was issued bearing the legend Quator Maria Vindico (‘I claim the four seas’)
and the seated figure of Britannia, the first to have appeared since Roman
times. These are sometimes described as ‘pattern farthings’ (i.e. experimental
designs) but most surviving examples are silver. They may have been issued also
as commemorative medals for the opening of the Second Dutch War – they are not
as rare as sometimes claimed. The reason they never appeared as circulating
coinage was probably because the legend was far too provocative
In
1667 a medal was struck to commemorate the Second Dutch War, which was fought
at sea between
The medal’s triumphant tone was a little
premature. Within months the Dutch had sailed up the river Medway near
Samuel Pepys saw the
medal, which was designed by John Roettier, on
At my goldsmith’s did observe the
King’s new Medall [sic], where in little there is Mrs Steward’s [sic] face, as well done as ever I saw
anything in my whole life I think – and a pretty thing it is that he should
choose her face to represent Britannia by’.
Samuel Pepys,
Diary
Of course these
medals were rare and did not circulate as coins. By 1672 the need for base
metal small change had become overwhelming. It was decided that copper
halfpennies and farthings would be struck. The copper blanks were sourced from
Britannia was chosen as the reverse type, based on the figure Roettier had created for the 1665 ‘pattern farthings’ and
the 1667 medal. The coin shown is a halfpenny of 1673 (diameter 30 mm).
Although halfpennies and farthings were not issued continuously
from 1672 on, Britannia remained the normal reverse type thereafter. Under
James II (1685-8) and William and Mary (1689—94) tin halfpennies and farthings
were issued – a very few were even struck under Charles II in 1684-5 but they
are extremely rare. These tin coins were prone to appalling corrosion, probably
because of the chemical effect of a copper plug in the middle of the coins.
Surviving examples of tin coins are mostly in wretched condition.
Under William and Mary copper halfpennies and farthings were resumed but the
source of the metal was different. Unlike Charles II’s
copper halfpennies and farthings, which retain a deep red patina, the later
copper coins usually became dark brown or even black.

This picture shows a copper halfpenny of William III, struck about
1699. During the eighteenth century halfpennies and farthings were issued in
some abundance. Britannia appears on all of them.
George
I (1714-27) halfpenny of 1717. This is the so-called ‘dump’ issue
which was smaller and thicker than other issues.

George II (1727-60) halfpenny of 1743. Diameter 28 mm.
George II issued halfpennies in abundance and they remain common today.
During the reign of George III (1760-1820) Britannia was a
continuous feature of the halfpennies and farthings struck from 1770-75. But
the coins, which resemble those of George II, were being relentlessly forged –
many surviving examples of this reign are contemporary counterfeits, often
featuring different legends in an attempt to confound the law against copying
coins of the realm.
In 1797 steam
presses were introduced to make new coins. Britannia now appeared on twopenny pieces, the penny, halfpenny and farthing. Until
this date the penny and twopence had only been struck
in silver. The new coins were issued at
Matthew Boulton’s mint at
]
The new twopences and pennies were considered too heavy and were
discontinued. A new design of halfpenny appeared in 1799 (illustrated –
diameter 29.5 mm).
Another new
design followed in 1806. The penny was also produced in this style but the twopence never appeared again. The pictures
shows a halfpenny of 1806, diameter 28 mm.
Under George IV
(1820-30) Britannia appeared on pennies, halfpennies and farthings but she now faced
right instead of left and would remain that way until 1967. She also acquired a
helmet, recalling Roma and before that Athena.
This is a penny of

Penny of George VI (1936-52), struck in 1939. Diameter
33.5 mm. Although there are numerous minor variations this basic design
remained in use from the 1860s to 1967, with a final proof version struck for
sets dated 1970 to mark the end of the old currency system.
Britannia
scarcely ever appeared on circulating silver coins. Under William IV (1830-7)
and Victoria (1837-1901), Britannia was used on the 16mm-wide fourpenny silver groat (not to be
confused with the Maundy fourpence). These coins were
only struck between 1836 and 1855, and then again in 1888, apart from a few
proof issues of 1855 and 1862. The design was the same as the pennies,
halfpennies and farthings.
Britannia also
appeared on the two shilling (florin) piece of Edward VII (1901-10). However,
she was shown standing up rather than sitting beside her shield. Picture shows
a florin of 1907, diameter 29 mm. The type wore very badly and good specimens
are hard to find. The design was abandoned in 1911 when George V succeeded his
father.
Britannia was permanently dropped from halfpennies and farthings in
1937. She remained on the pennies until 1967 and the special issue of 1970.
When
Britannia also
appears on the silver bullion ‘Britannia’ £2 coins issued annually by the Royal Mint. There have been several different designs. The design for
2005 restores Britannia to a facing-left type very similar to the original
coins struck by the Romans and under Charles II. Diameter
39.5 mm. Perhaps it is just as well since the present Prime Minister,
Gordon Brown, has approved the scandalous decision to remove Britannia from
circulating coinage. Still, one should consider it a favour when a politician
digs his own grave and thereby saves others from having to do it for him.
Back to the Home Page